[Beowulf] many cores and ib
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gilad Shainer Shainer at mellanox.comMon May 5 13:56:55 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Next message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Lindahl [mailto:lindahl at pbm.com] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 1:49 PM > To: Gilad Shainer > Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] many cores and ib > > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:42:49PM -0700, Gilad Shainer wrote: > > > It is the same benchmark that QLogic were and are using for MPI > > message rate, > > Like many benchmarks, you can game the benchmark, and you > gamed the benchmark. I guess you don't understand the > technical details well enough to get what's going on; we had > a longer discussion of this a while ago on this list. > > I caught HP doing the same thing with lm_bench's lat_mem_rd > benchmark a while ago, and they immediately apologized and > stopped using it in their marketing literature. Which shows a > lot of class. > > -- greg > This goes nowhere. QLogic former benchmark for MPI message rate, is now available also on OSU MPI, to provide the same comparison. I do not want this conversation become a marketing bash. Especially that you are no longer with QLogic, and your email provide a good reason for why. Gilad.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Next message: [Beowulf] many cores and ib
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
