Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Confused over the term cluster

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Douglas Eadline deadline at eadline.org
Sun Mar 30 12:27:39 PDT 2008


My short operational definition of a cluster is collection of
independent systems (motherboards) that communicate
over a private network/interconnect, none of which
are dependent on the other for operating, with
excetion of the head/master/gateway node.

Under this definition, a multi-core node is not a cluster
nor is any design whose operation is dependent
upon shared memory between nodes, even though the
nodes are separate systems. Of course this is my
definition.

BTW, I believe the following is also used:

N=nodes
P=cores/processors per node

P>=N = cluster
N<P = constellation


--
Doug


> Hi,
>
> I am kinda confused with term cluster and now am sure if this where I can
> post my question. What exactly can be defined as a cluster ?, We have a 32
> node cluster in our lab. and the number 32 here is referred to 32 separate
> machines ( each with its own processor ). What about the new machines
> like,
> dual core processors or the quad core processors, are those considered
> clusters also. For example, should we refer to a quad core processor as a
> cluster of 4 processors. Hope someone out there could explain. Thanks
>
>
> !DSPAM:47ec49f7195876865219710!
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>
>
> !DSPAM:47ec49f7195876865219710!
>


--
Doug



More information about the Beowulf mailing list