[Beowulf] Which Xeon supports NUMA?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgWed Mar 19 04:04:30 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NMI (Non maskable interrupts)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which Xeon supports NUMA?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Carsten Aulbert" <carsten.aulbert at aei.mpg.de> wrote: > Sorry, I came up with this question because when compiling 2.6.24.3 > (linux kernel) I came across these lines: > > For x86_64 this is recommended on all multiprocessor Opteron systems. > > > > If the system is EM64T, you should say N unless your system is > EM64T NUMA. Interestingly that text dates back to a modification for 2.6.14-rc5 back in 2005: http://osdir.com/ml/linux.ports.x86-64.general/2005-10/msg00140.html with a comment that says: # CONFIG_K8_NUMA is not needed for Intel EM64T NUMA boxes So either this was in the early days of CSI, or there are/were other Intel AMD64 NUMA boxes out there that none of us know about.. cheers! Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NMI (Non maskable interrupts)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which Xeon supports NUMA?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
