[Beowulf] Go-playing machines
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comTue Jun 24 13:15:42 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Go-playing machines
- Next message: [Beowulf] Go-playing machines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vincent, I found your reply very agreable except this: "The first few moves in go decide the outcome of the game already, as the rest is just a 'playout' of the first few moves. So what matters most is the first few moves in the game." Many professional games are decided in the endgame. When I lose at chess, it's almost always resignation within 50 moves; when I lose at go, it's frequently necessary to count, less frequently resignation (but handicaps make more games close), and I think I never resign before move 150 or so. In fact, some crazy mathematicians proved that the endgame in go is very tricky, see http://senseis.xmp.net/?TemperatureCGT (using "temperature" from combinatorial game theory). As it happens I'm really bad at fuseki, and often have to catch up with fighting in the middle game, which often leads to resentful squeezing of the yose :-) So I rarely have quick games. Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080624/43719cf2/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Go-playing machines
- Next message: [Beowulf] Go-playing machines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
