[Beowulf] Go-playing machines
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comTue Jun 24 09:20:25 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] FYI: HPC Server 2008 hits top 25
- Next message: [Beowulf] Go-playing machines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Programming a computer to play Go (an Asian strategy boardgame) has been difficult; some people say it's proof that Go is better or harder than chess, since computers can beat masters at chess but struggle at Go. (I think that statistically a game of go is about equivalent to a two-game match of chess; both games empty your brain quickly of course). My view is that while go may be somewhat harder to reduce to tree-searching, the main advantage of computer chess was an early start, e.g. von Neumann. This article: http://www.usgo.org/resources/downloads/CogApdx%20II-2.pdf describes recent trends in computer Go and mentions a 32-node cluster, 8 cores per node. Apparently MPI parallelization is recent for them and they are making good progress. Peter The game Go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_%28game%29 AGA (American Go Association): http://www.usgo.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080624/373d2814/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] FYI: HPC Server 2008 hits top 25
- Next message: [Beowulf] Go-playing machines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
