[Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Håkon Bugge Hakon.Bugge at scali.comTue Jun 24 02:57:24 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Next message: [Beowulf] FYI: HPC Server 2008 hits top 25
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Mark, At 17:25 23.06.2008, Mark Hahn wrote: >>5) In which cases is it reasonable to switch on >>"Node memory interleaving" (in BIOS) for the >>application which uses more memory than is presented on the node ? > >I leave it off, since numactl --interleave lets >you get the same effect from user-space. I'm >not sure I've ever seen it be a win. numactl --interleave will for sure use (at least) page resolution performing the interleave. In my fantasy, I imagine the hardware interleave to be on a cache-line boundary. If that is the case, you might see differences though, for example if the threads/processes tend to generate cache misses to a single page, but different lines within that page. Probably an unlikely scenario for real applications... Håkon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Again about NUMA (numactl and taskset)
- Next message: [Beowulf] FYI: HPC Server 2008 hits top 25
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
