[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Jun 19 17:08:43 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Samuel wrote: > ----- "Robert G. Brown" <rgb at phy.duke.edu> wrote: > >> IIRC almost any of the high-end encryption routines available within >> linux are effectively uncrackable, certainly uncrackable to somebody >> with less than NSA-class resources. > > As long as the implementation is correct.. <cough>Debian SSL</cough>. :-) N-tro-PEE? We dont need no steen-keen N-tro-PEE! Get yer fresh hot bits here, all 15 of them. > Humans are always the weak links in these things, > whether that be implementation, crypto security or > just doing plain dumb things like sending an email > confirmation in the clear containing plain text > passwords that were submitted over SSL. People spend lots of time and effort on security theater. Make up odd rules for passwords. Make them hard to guess and crack. Well, is that the vector for break-ins? Weak passwords? I saw a linux machine (a cluster) rooted. It was rooted because of a person with a windows laptop that happened to catch a key logger. Crackers had been attempting to break in to that machine for a long time, and here goes a grad student, and gives them the password. Worse, this grad student acted in a way we advised against, and ran jobs from root. Yeah, I know. Security theater is troubling. It gives us sheep the appearance of being secure, without any real additional value. Opie and multi-factor are hard to beat. And no theater needed. Even better, no worries about replay attacks with opie, or with a multi-factor that disables a password upon use. But even with these, you still need good *real* practices. A non-security theater practice would limit the damage one can do in a non-privileged setting. SElinux and Apparmor try to limit the damage even in a secure setting, though I am not sure how well they do there. Joe -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
