[Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comThu Jun 19 12:53:37 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Lux <James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.gov> writes: >>Thermonuclear fusion and the 100+ KT to MT range are similarly >>straightforward. From what I recall, one can just monkey around with >>building bigger bombs surrounded by more fissile material and get close >>to the latter, adding fusile material such as tritium (expensive and >>dangerous) or deuterium (plentiful and harmless) and lithium into spaces >>between trigger and a U-238 casing. > > Uh.. probably not.. That's the "alarm clock" or "layer cake" design > and has some issues. I refer interested readers to Morland's 1977 > article in "The Progressive" for more information. "Dark Sun" by Richard Rhodes is probably better (and more entertaining). It describes the Teller-Ulam mechanism in some detail. I will point out that, if the description of the initial Ivy Mike test is to be taken as an indication, it actually requires quite a bit of effort to put together such a thing -- one need worry about amateurs building fission devices, but probably no fusion... Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
