[Beowulf] Re: [OT: LTO Ultrium (3) throughput?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comWed Jun 18 18:09:30 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [OT: LTO Ultrium (3) throughput?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: OT: LTO Ultrium (3) throughput?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Mathog wrote: > Joe Landman wrote: [...] > Maybe it will mean more to you than it does to me... > > % lsscsi --long > [8:0:0:0] tape HP Ultrium 3-SCSI D21D /dev/st0 > state=running queue_depth=32 scsi_level=4 type=1 device_blocked=0 > timeout=900 Hmmm... queue_depth of 32? On a tape? Weird. There has been some strangeness in the TCQ/NCQ layers. Might want to try to set this to 1 and see if it helps echo 1 > /sys/block/st0/device/queue_depth (note: some drivers don't support changing the queue_depth) > lspci -v > 04:04.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec ASC-29320ALP U320 (rev 10) > Subsystem: Adaptec ASC-29320LPE PCIe U320 > Flags: bus master, 66MHz, slow devsel, latency 32, IRQ 19 > I/O ports at 4400 [disabled] [size=256] > Memory at d8400000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K] > I/O ports at 4000 [disabled] [size=256] > [virtual] Expansion ROM at d8600000 [disabled] [size=512K] > Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 > Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/1 > Enable- > Capabilities: [94] PCI-X non-bridge device Looks like a PCI-x adapter. This shouldn't be an issue though. Try changing the block size. 2M to 8M, and see what happens. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [OT: LTO Ultrium (3) throughput?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: OT: LTO Ultrium (3) throughput?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
