[Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comWed Jun 18 14:46:04 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:51:04AM -0400, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > Someone made the inaccurate statement that CUDA programming is difficult > and time-consuming. One data point cannot prove that CUDA is easy. There are people out there claiming that FPGAs are easy to program, because they're one of the 7 people on the planet for whom programming an FPGA is easy. I've looked over CUDA and some examples, and while it's better looking than some of the other GPU programming languages out there, it's clear that it is more difficult and time-consuming than using traditional languages on traditional cpus. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: "hobbyists"
- Next message: [Beowulf] NVIDIA GPUs, CUDA, MD5, and "hobbyists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
