Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

NDAs Re: [Beowulf] Nvidia, cuda, tesla and... where's my double floating point?

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.com
Mon Jun 16 11:30:39 PDT 2008


Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
> Jim,
> 
> Reality is that the person who SPECULATES that something is good
> also hides behind a DNA. This is another typical case of that.

Hiding behind DNA?  Gotta be thin ...

(ok ok, I'll keep my day job ...)

> On the one hand claiming a NDA, on the other hand implying that is a 
> very good product that will get
> released.

An NDA is a device to allow a company to get its act together while 
getting feedback on the product they want to release.   It is quite useful.

[...]

> If NVIDIA clearly indicates towards me that they aren't gonna release 
> any technical data nor support anyone with technical

er ... have you looked at the site I indicated?

> data (the word NDA has not been used by the way by either party, it was 
> a very clear NJET from 'em),
> and all information i've got so far is very dissapointing, then hiding 
> behind a NDA is considered very bad manners.

No, it's not.  It seems to me that given the number of applications out 
there now using their kit, that rumors of a lack of information to use 
their kit might be ... er ...  not well founded.

> Either shut up entirely or do not hide behind a NDA.

Ah ... Ok.  Manners, manners Vincent.

[...]

> In case of NVIDIA if you google a tad you will figure out that the 
> double precision promise has been done more than once,

Hmmm.... I would suggest you sign an NDA with them, and learn what it is 
they are talking about to their customers, though I suspect they may not 
wish to pre-divulge information to you given what you have indicated here.

[...]

> IBM now shows up with a working supercomputer using new generation CELL 
> processors which have a sustained 77 Gflop double precision
> a chip which means a tad more than 150 Gflop for each node. Each 
> rackmount node is relative cheap and performs very well.

Cell is good.  Now try to program it.  Yes, it is a SMOP ( 
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/S/SMOP.html )

> 1 Petaflop @ 2.66 MW, that's really good.

Yup.  Exaflop at 2.66 GW.  Waaa hoooo!!!!


-- 
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
        http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615



More information about the Beowulf mailing list