[Beowulf] Green Cluster?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Huw Lynes lynesh at cardiff.ac.ukMon Jul 21 01:42:49 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Green Cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Green Cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 21:20 -0400, Joe Landman wrote:
> Greg Lindahl wrote:
> That said, we like IPMI in general, and even better when it works :(
> Sometimes it does go south, in a hurry (gets into a strange state). In
> which case, removing power is the only option.
Agreed. Currently my most common reason for going into the machine room
is to pull the power cable out of a node in the hope that the BMC will
reset in a sane state, which it usually does. If I had network switched
PDUs I'd never have to leave my office.
The advantage of smart PDUs is that they can switch off anything whereas
IPMI and other lights-out systems usually only exist on computers. All
things being equal I'd rather have both.
There is also a green issue here. Modern systems draw power even when
they are "off" in order to keep the BMC and network card live. Obviously
a system switched off at the PDU draws no power. Having said that I
haven't looked at how much power an unloaded smart PDU draws.
Thanks,
Huw
--
Huw Lynes | Advanced Research Computing
HEC Sysadmin | Cardiff University
| Redwood Building,
Tel: +44 (0) 29208 70626 | King Edward VII Avenue, CF10 3NB
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Green Cluster?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Green Cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
