[Beowulf] Re: Religious wars
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bob Drzyzgula bob at drzyzgula.orgTue Jul 22 13:19:10 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Religious wars
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Religious wars
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:54:06AM -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > > It is not even certain that the default, base install of a Linux > > system will include Emacs > > This just indicates a conspiracy of vi users. Or, more likely, > vi users complained that emacs was in the default. Emacs users > aren't bothered by having vi around. But I don't understand... if resources aren't an issue (and certainly they haven't been for at least a decade, since BIOSs started supporting El Torito) and systems programmers are *not* more likely to be vi users than emacs users, would't we be seeing emacs on more live and rescue CDs by now? I'm curious as to how the vi conspiracy effects its apparent influence... :-) :-) :-) --Bob
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Religious wars
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Religious wars
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
