[Beowulf] Distros - Fermi, Scientific Linux
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Galitz geoff at galitz.orgMon Jul 21 14:16:17 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Distros - Fermi, Scientific Linux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Green Cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> A major premise for using either distro is their claim for long term support > (LTS). > > I'm curious to know how many folks on this list use either distro and what has > been your experience (and usefulness) of LTS? ------------------------------------------------ In my UC Berkeley days I routinely installed Scientific Linux on new clusters. The long LTS was a major factor contributing to my usage of it. Security updates, in particular, were of high-priority. I'd also do a general update if we made a major change to the cluster (new nodes or some particularly finicky major new code)... so I found the LTS to be quite useful. In terms of general support we were self-sufficient enough that we could apply bugfixes or patches out-of-stream if necessary. -geoff
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Distros - Fermi, Scientific Linux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Green Cluster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
