[Beowulf] Re: energy costs and poor grad students
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Kosmowski mark.kosmowski at gmail.comThu Jul 10 06:29:51 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IPoIB arp's disappearing
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: energy costs and poor grad students
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
A couple weeks ago I complained about energy costs with respect to my personal cluster used for graduate work. I received a great deal of excellent advice as well as some offers of compute time when I'm ready for production runs. Thank you everyone! My solution so far has been to consolidate my DIMMs onto one workstation - I have 14 Gb on it. During this process I learned which of my 2 Gb DIMMs was bad. I'm also in the process of upgrading my entertainment machine to a 64 bit dual-core Athlon Linux box to be used as a part-time compute node as needed. Also, I'm on the lookout for a couple cheap 2 Gb ECC registered DDR 400 DIMMs to bring the workstation to a full 16 Gb at some point. I may also keep an eye out for multi-core Opterons. I have also decided to upgrade my software to try an eek a little speed out of things. I've done a clean install of OpenSUSE 11.0 using KDE 3.5 (I need the GUI for the workstation) and will be installing the latest versions of OpenMPI, CPMD, compilers and math libraries. Some people on the CPMD list (my primary code at this point - plane wave quantum chemistry) suggest fftw as part of the math library solution. I noticed that only fftw 2.1.5 supports MPI, while the latest version of the 3.x series does not. Eventually I will be running large jobs and may need to go back to a cluster, so I'm interested in keeping my code MPI-ready and running two processors that way. I will likely use the ACML (AMD math library) for the functionality not provided by fftw. I am uncertain whether I will use ifort or gfortran at the moment. I'd be willing to look at the Sun suite. Other then hopefully a PhD at some point, I am receiving no compensation for my research, so ifort is a free option. Is fftw 2.1.5 and the latest acml a reasonable combination for speed / efficiency or is there a different combination of math libraries that stands out for speed? Is the choice of math library yet another instance of the actual application makes a difference on which on is fastest? Also, is there a recent compiler benchmark somewhere? The one at Polyhedron seems a little dated - the ifort cited is known to have issues with the code I use and the Sun compiler is given as 8.x when 12.x is available now. If I break down and decide to run my own benchmarks on actual code are there any restrictions on the free versions of ifort and Sun to share the results? Thanks, Mark E. Kosmowski
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IPoIB arp's disappearing
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: energy costs and poor grad students
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
