[Beowulf] /usr/local over NFS is okay, Joe
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Jul 3 08:24:23 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] /usr/local over NFS is okay, Joe
- Next message: [Beowulf] /usr/local over NFS is okay, Joe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> Joe Landman wrote:
>>
>> Prentice Bisbal wrote:
>>
>>> Here's another reason to use tarballs: I have /usr/local shared to all
>> eeek!! something named local is shared???
>
> Nothing wrong with that. "local" doesn't necessarily mean local to the
> physical machine. It can mean for the local site. I do everything
Yeah, it is ambiguous to a degree, but I figure that something named
/local is actually going to be physically local. It helps tremendously
when a user calls up with a problem, say that they can't see a file they
placed in /local/... on all nodes. Usually they get quiet for a moment
after saying that aloud, and then say "oh, never mind". :)
[...]
> I don't dump the binaries into one path. I put symlinks into
> /usr/local/bin{,64}. All the binaries go into /usr/local/foo-xx.yy and
> stay there:
We used to do this, but things kept getting overwritten by zealous
package management tools. So we started using modules and showing
people how to add paths by hand if they were adamant about not using
modules ...
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423
fax : +1 734 786 8452
cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] /usr/local over NFS is okay, Joe
- Next message: [Beowulf] /usr/local over NFS is okay, Joe
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
