[Beowulf] A press release
hahn at mcmaster.ca
Tue Jul 1 22:06:43 PDT 2008
>> I was hoping for some discussion of concrete issues. for instance,
>> I have the impression debian uses something other than sysvinit -
>> does that work out well?
> Debian uses standard sysvinit-style scripts in /etc/init.d, /etc/rc0.d, ...
thanks. I guess I was assuming that mainstream debian was like ubuntu.
>> is it a problem getting commercial
>> packages (pathscale/pgi/intel compilers, gaussian, etc) to run?
> I¹ve never had any major problems. Most linux vendors supply both RPM¹s and
> .tar.gz installers, and I generally have better luck with the latter, even
> on RPM based systems anyway.
interesting - I wonder why. the main difference would be that the rpm
format encodes dependencies...
>> the couple debian people I know tend to have more ideological motives
>> (which I do NOT impugn, except that I am personally more swayed by
>> practical, concrete reasons.)
> My conversion¹ to use of Debian had little to do with ideological motives,
> and a lot more to do with minimizing the amount of time I had to take away
> from my research to support the Linux clusters I was maintaining at the
again interesting, thanks. what sorts of things in rpm-based distros
consumed your time?
> Side note, one very nice thing about debian is the ability to upgrade a
> system in-place from one O/S release to another via
> apt-get dist-upgrade
> Much nicer than reinstalling the O/S as seems to be (used to be?) the norm
> with RPM-based systems
I've done major version upgrades using rpm, admittedly in the pre-fedora
days. it _is_ a nice capability - I'm a little surprised desktop-oriented
distros don't emphasize it...
More information about the Beowulf