[Beowulf] automount on high ports
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comTue Jul 1 08:48:47 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] automount on high ports
- Next message: [Beowulf] automount on high ports
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts <tjrc at sanger.ac.uk> writes: > Certainly on my systems where I use the am-utils automounter, I find > the limit on the number of simultaneously mounted filesystems is more > in the region of 1500. And that's doubtless not from TCP port issues but because of other kinds of resources being limited. > I've been desperately trying to reduce the number of NFS filesystems > we have though. Currently our automount map has about 600 entries, > I think. Sometimes that's reasonable. I've seen large sites where everyone has a workstation in front of them and all of the thousands of users get their home dir automounted when they sit in front of a box and log in. However, one notes that in such a situation, the automount maps have thousands or tens of thousands of entries, but any given machine generally only is mounting a few file systems. -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] automount on high ports
- Next message: [Beowulf] automount on high ports
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
