[Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Meng Kuan mengkuan at sxven.comWed Jan 16 18:31:10 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
- Next message: [Beowulf] Off Topic: HPC Training
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jan 17, 2008 1:09 AM, Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> wrote: > That said, and the point of this is that many HPC apps are rapidly > becoming IO bound, as they need to move ginormous (meaning really large) > amounts of data to and from disk, and MPI codes usually need to move > data at the lowest latency possible. > > There VMs which negatively impact IO performance (bandwidth/latency) > will be problematic. > > What would be interesting is a VM OS bypass for IO. VM talk directly to > hardware. Not sure it is possible though, unless you are using a > hypervisor, and a thin VM (OpenVZ?). I believe Xen is working towards that. For instance, their latest release (Xen 3.2.0) has: - Preliminary PCI pass-through support (using appropriate Intel or AMD I/O-virtualisation hardware) I have read on the Xen lists that some folks have successfully increased network performance this way. OpenVZ is a possibility and it definitely is "thinner" than Xen in this aspect. This is why we are using the libvirt library which is starting to include support for containers like OpenVZ. > > Just some thoughts, hopefully not all that flammable (Jeff, what is > that rule? I am being asked, and I don't have an answer ...) Not at all. In fact, its great to hear and learn from you guys. Thanks! Regards, Meng Kuan
- Previous message: [Beowulf] VMC - Virtual Machine Console
- Next message: [Beowulf] Off Topic: HPC Training
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
