Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Question on COAMPS, WRF and NHM

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Anand Vaidya anandvaidya.ml at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 07:21:50 PST 2008


We are in the process of acquiring a new cluster for running weather modelling 
software viz. NRL COAMPS, WRF and NHM (Japan)

We are currently running COAMPS on a Cluster of 50+ GigE and dual socket DC 
Opterons, NFS, CentOS4, RAM size=1GB/core, the performance seems to be 
limited by I/O (network I/O primarily). The performance flattens out at about 
32CPU.

Looking at the budget, current hardware availability, we have narrowed down to 
dual socket Intel Quad Cores, with 2GB/core and DDR infiniband, and CentOS 
5.x, OpenMPI 1.2.x, SGE 6.x (Or maybe we will buy faster D-DC AMDs)

We did enquire with the organizations regarding suitability of these, they 
could only offer limited help (understandably, the orgs may not be running 
the configs we intend to buy)

I do understand that factors such as grid size etc play a role. I am right now 
looking at gross factors before getting into actual test runs with different 
configs.

I would like to to whether any users of the aforementioned software can help 
answer the following questions:

- Does memory bandwidth (STREAMS?) have a significant impact? (Intel shared 
bus -vs- AMD's dedicated interconnect), since QCs worsen the shared bus 
loading

- Is infiniband worth it? (NRL seems to think it does enhance performance), 
however no additional details are available.

- Is a parallel filesystem (eg: Lustre, GPFS, GFS) vs NFS

Regards
Anand



More information about the Beowulf mailing list