[Beowulf] Multiple NIC on a node
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comTue Jan 8 10:29:46 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multiple NIC on a node
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multiple NIC on a node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter St. John wrote: > I don't get it? I would have thought that if a large package were split > between two NICs with two cables, then assuming the buffering and > recombination at each end to be faster than the transmission, then the > transmission would be faster than over a single cable? You don't mean that The problem is ordering of packets and TCP. When you send a single TCP stream over two (or more) paths, then some packets will arrive out-of-order at the destination. TCP really does not like out-of-order packets and performance takes a (big) hit. That's why most channel bonding mechanisms balance multiple streams over multiple NICs and send each stream on a single NIC. Other protocols than TCP may not have this problem if they don't require strict ordering for performance. Patrick
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multiple NIC on a node
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multiple NIC on a node
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
