[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Peter St. John peter.st.john at gmail.comThu Feb 28 10:07:59 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim, Just re: "If one wanted to design revolutionary distributed/parallel computing algorithms, one could probably work with floppy disks and sneakernet. If it works there, it will certainly work on any faster mechanism. See.. true computer science doesn't need a 1000 processor cluster." I agree of course, I grew up on paper and pencil, but there's one proviso: the process of trial and error is just murder with floppies and sneakernet. If trial and error is part of your development process, then a thousand processor cluster (whatever powerful hardware) is so convenient as to be qualitatively necessary. It still astounds me that Holland came up with Genetic Algorithms in the sixties, though; so you're right it's possible to do without. Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080228/d20b85fc/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
