[Beowulf] What are people seeing performance-wise for NFS over 10GbE
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Feb 28 05:53:36 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] What are people seeing performance-wise for NFS over 10GbE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi folks: Have a few simple setups that I am trying to figure out if I have a problem, or if what I am seeing is normal. Two 10 GbE cards, connected with a CX4 cable. Server is one of our JackRabbits, with 750+ MB/s direct IO and 500-650 MB/s buffered IO (read-write), for IO about 10x system ram (~100x RAID cache). Getting ok iperf numbers, about 7 Gb/s single thread. Running NFS, and seeing ~200-300 MB/s best case between the systems. Is this what others have seen? Latest drivers from vendor, sent a note to them to see if we can figure this out. Figured I would tap into the 'wulf collective memory to learn what other people see. 2.6.23.14 kernel on both sides, jumbo frames enabled. No switch, just a CX4 cable. My expectations are that we would be able to see 80-90% of the JackRabbits speed, with the rest being eaten by stack issues. This is the case over channel bonded GbE. Do you see 500 MB/s or more? Less? Thanks. Joe -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] What are people seeing performance-wise for NFS over 10GbE
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
