[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue Feb 26 13:42:05 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bruno Coutinho wrote: > Yes, and more than an out of order processor. A out of order processor, > can reorder the instructions whenever a hazard occurs. A in order > processor, on the other hand, has to wait. With SMT, it can switch to > another thread. > > And today memory access can stall up to hundreds of cycles, so any > processor can hide this latency by switching to another thread. My gosh ... we have re-invented the Tera MTA. ... > But the you have to make sure the processor has enough cache and memory > bandwidth to handle the increased memory traffic (like Sun Niagara). The problem with many (cores|threads) is that memory bandwidth wall. A fixed size (B) pipe to memory, with N requesters on that pipe ... -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
