[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comMon Feb 25 12:47:58 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Broadley wrote: > I believe it's actually simultaneous, instructions from 2 different > processes can run in the same cycle against 2 different register files. > > Other chips have vertical multithreading where only 1 process runs in > any given cycle. Multiple threads residing in any particular stage of execution at any particular time. If one thread stalls, the processor can proceed with execution on the other thread. Somewhat outside the bounds of this list, but would an in order processor like Power 6 derive more benefit from SMT? -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
