[Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduMon Feb 25 12:12:18 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I believe it's actually simultaneous, instructions from 2 different processes can run in the same cycle against 2 different register files. Other chips have vertical multithreading where only 1 process runs in any given cycle. Peter St. John wrote: > Just for a clarification (for those of us who are hardware deficient), > hyperthreading (the Intel mechanism) isn't actually simultaneous, correct? I > had assumed so but I appear to be confused about it. Hyperthreading keeps a > thread ready to take advantage of stalls in a preceeding thread, but doesn't > ever actually perform a second instruction in one click tick, correct? One > might think that there are so many pathways on a modern chip that collisions > could be managed among several simultaneous threads. > Thanks, > Peter > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Opinions of Hyper-threading?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
