[Beowulf] High Performance SSH/SCP
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduFri Feb 15 14:26:26 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] High Performance SSH/SCP
- Next message: [Beowulf] High Performance SSH/SCP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > 4 years ago, I set up kerberos for the very first time, without any > prior experience. I read through the relevant chapters of the O' Reilly > Kerberos book and had it up and running in only a couple of days. Most > of that time was spent reading. I disagree with RGB's equation > > rsh + anything = (difficulty)^2 > > I found that once kerberos is set up, using kerberized rsh is > essentially invisible, therefore > > rsh + kerberos = difficulty > > which is a first-order relationship. > > If anything, setting up rsh is the most difficult one. Why? Since rsh is > so insecure, the distro producers/vendors have created many hurdle you > must hop to get it working (correct file and owner permissions, etc.) > Ironic. My equation was empirical, and it isn't really squared, and the experience was with real newbies. You have to understand, a lot of people who get into cluster computing really have NO zero nada Unix experience. Some of them ask me how to set up a Windows cluster initially, until I point out that I don't do Windows (and here's why). I summarized that a bit in the last post, though, and won't recapitulate. Also, things just plain don't always work. Not even for me on my own systems, and I'm a 22 year Unix sysadmin (just kidding, last post, about the amateur bit:-). Just as a currently relevant example: (Following yum install \*pvm\*, Fedora 8, same laptop on which pvm WORKED when I was asking about it last week.) ... Total download size: 2.6 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): pvm-3.4.5-7.fc6.1. 100% |=========================| 2.1 MB 00:02 (2/2): pvm-gui-3.4.5-7.fc 100% |=========================| 549 kB 00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: pvm ######################### [1/2] Installing: pvm-gui ######################### [2/2] Installed: pvm-gui.i386 0:3.4.5-7.fc6.1 Dependency Installed: pvm.i386 0:3.4.5-7.fc6.1 Complete! rgb at cain|B:1031#z [3]+ Stopped su rgb at cain|B:1038>xpvm libpvm [pid14741] /tmp/pvmd.1337: No such file or directory libpvm [pid14741]: Can't Start PVM: Can't start pvmd OK, this is trying to start up xpvm (or pvm) on a brand, shiny, so-new-it-hurts fresh yum install on Fedora 8 on a system where it worked last week. It quit. I haven't GOTTEN to where rsh or ssh matters (and besides, I have had a working PVM environment for about fifteen years now). So what's wrong? If this isn't bad enough, I installed PVM two days ago on nine F8 boxes and IT worked perfectly, but xpvm failed (and I discovered that it wouldn't work on my laptop where it was just working). Why? It will no doubt be a long and painful process to figure it out. To first order, the PVM RPM installs the binaries in bin/LINUX under intel, but the /usr/bin/xpvm script is forming LINUX$(ARCH) and it should be LINUXI386 -- this is an actual PVM bug -- but there is still more wrong. Now imagine me helping a newbie get started with PVM. I've used it for years, works perfectly. They tell me that they run pvm and get an error message like this one. EVEN if I've seen this before and figured it out once, I've long since forgotten. It has re-broken. Or it's new. Is it PVM? Is it paths? Is it rsh or ssh? Bug in the distro RPM? When things work like they're supposed to, it is as you say extremely simple and the online guides work fine. When it doesn't, you have to debug EVERY ERROR PATHWAY, and adding layers adds infinite pain. Infinite pain "squared", if you're trying to do so via email with somebody on the other end of the line that is using an xterm for the first time and who might be working as root for all that you know. So sure, as I said one can certainly do what you describe if you know what you're doing, are self-starting, a manual reader, and a problem solver. YMMV painwise, even if you're an expert, depending on whether things WORK they way they are supposed to and how hard it is to discover where your setup deviates from the assumptions in the documentation. But if you fail on any of these, the pain index rapidly escalates to "quit and write novels instead", or "get new job as prison guard" or even "perform self-appendectomy with a rusty spoon". (You laugh, but I'd bet even money that a show of hands among the real old hand cluster people on list would turn up a dozen or more with some nasty scars on their lower abdomen;-) rgb > > - -- > Prentice Bisbal > Linux Software Support Specialist/System Administrator > School of Natural Sciences > Institute for Advanced Study > Princeton, NJ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHtgoh2n4m8G8ypgARApKbAKDTM4dDBTbEsPGZ96ATimhh93akEACgqhfW > XKuset0dI1xR9rAq3OY38fM= > =KQGF > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Robert G. Brown Phone(cell): 1-919-280-8443 Duke University Physics Dept, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Web: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb Book of Lilith Website: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Lilith/Lilith.php Lulu Bookstore: http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=877977
- Previous message: [Beowulf] High Performance SSH/SCP
- Next message: [Beowulf] High Performance SSH/SCP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
