[Beowulf] centos5 as cluster os
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comFri Feb 15 13:28:23 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] centos5 as cluster os
- Next message: [Beowulf] centos5 as cluster os
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > > > Mark Hahn wrote: >>> whats everyones take on centos as a cluster os. >> >> works fine for me, but I also don't think distros are very important. >> the critical things are: >> >> - must have a decent package system. yum is; I'm not familiar enough >> with urpmi or apt to know them. I think both provide appropriate >> management of dependencies. > > Yum is good, so is apt. I still have a problem with yum wanting to > install i386 binaries as well as the x86_64 ones. Haven't learned how > to stop that yet (probably simple too). > > There is much I do not like about rpm. However it has a few nice > features. I can't live without > > rpm -qa > rpm -ql package > rpm -qf file > > and am going through withdrawl as apt does not seem to provide these (or > if they do, it isn't at all obvious how/where). > I am here with your fix: http://diablo.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/debian/apt-dpkg-ref.html Of particular interest rpm -qa equates to dpkg -l rpm -ql equates to -L <packagename> rpm -qf equates to dpkg -S <filename> Trust me, Debian based distros are the next best thing to crack cocaine. -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs
- Previous message: [Beowulf] centos5 as cluster os
- Next message: [Beowulf] centos5 as cluster os
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
