[Beowulf] Re: Cheap SDR IB
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Rankin wrankin at ee.duke.eduTue Feb 5 09:21:53 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Cheap SDR IB
- Next message: [Beowulf] PVM on wireless...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> >> There's definitely potential for better interconnects and game >> clusters (deja vu, we must have discussed this some 5-8 years ago). > > Yeah, and my experiences with 2ndL are highly negatory as a > consequence. > It is a bad cluster design. It does not scale. I have not puttered around in SL for a while, but IIRC one of the "problems" is that SL allows the user to create their own fairly complex physical models and devices which is computationally restrictive when modeled on the server side and also bandwidth restricted when pushing the models out to the client. WoW, OTOH heavily restrict user customization which saves both server cycles as well as bandwidth. This does heavily restrict the user experience (which is one of the strengths of SL) but pays back in responsiveness. > SL needs to adopt some of the technologies of other MMRPGs -- the ones > that work. It makes the result more complex on the client side -- one > has to update WoW every six months or so with new textures, maps, and > display side bugfixes Actually, SL was going through a frequent update period for quite a while and I don't think it was any better than Wow in that respect. -b
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Cheap SDR IB
- Next message: [Beowulf] PVM on wireless...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
