[Beowulf] using Nagios to monitor compute nodes: NPRE vs check_by_ssh
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.comTue Dec 23 01:30:31 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using Nagios to monitor compute nodes: NPRE vs check_by_ssh
- Next message: [Beowulf] Not all cores are created equal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2008/12/23 Rahul Nabar <rpnabar at gmail.com> > > I'd like (2) because it is more secure and seems easier to deploy but > I'm a bit afraid if this will overtax my central server. > > Any suggestions? Are other users using Nagios here? > Rahul, I'm not a Nagios expert, but I have used NRPE for monitoring quite some time on the past. My answer would be to give it a try - I'm sure that for the workload type monitoring you are talkign about you could turn down the frequency of the checks if the load is too high. It would be interesting to hear your findings on the list when you try it. Re NRPE, why do you say it would be too difficult to deploy? The method would be to get it right on one node, then set it up on other nodes using a parallel command shell, such as pdsh or cexec. You do have something like that in place I trust? John H -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081223/4cc9a762/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using Nagios to monitor compute nodes: NPRE vs check_by_ssh
- Next message: [Beowulf] Not all cores are created equal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
