[Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lux, James P james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govSat Dec 20 07:57:00 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] max number of NFS threads: NFS config optimization
- Next message: [Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/20/08 6:41 AM, "Liang Yupeng" <start2046 at gmail.com> wrote: > Lux, James P wrote: >> >> I've been looking over the Beowulf book by Seamus Heaney, and I can't find >> any reference to clus http://www.amazon.com/Beowulf-New-Verse-Translation-Bilingual/dp/0393320979ters in it, so maybe Wikipedia has been misled? Perhaps >> it's a translation issue?<grin> >> >> > Thanks for your reply, but "no reference in the book" does not mean that > Beowulf is not a cluster, does it? Especially since that particular book is a translation of the epic poem about Beowulf. http://www.amazon.com/Beowulf-New-Verse-Translation-Bilingual/dp/0393320979 (my daughter is using an older translation in her 10th grade english class, and prefers the new one) >> Beowulf -> the definition evolves.. But.. I'd say it's a bunch of >> interconnected commodity computers intended to form a single computational >> resource. Some would add "running open source software" Commodity is >> important. It's not special purpose hardware, but leverages the economies of >> scale to minimize cost. Bunch of interconnected is important.(no vector >> processors). Single computational resource -> you can devote the entire >> cluster to just one problem, as opposed to, say, a mass of transaction >> processing boxes or web servers in a high availability cluster. >> >> > Maybe I didn't get you (sorry for that), it looks like that your > explanation on Beowulf not the category about it but the description. > Thank you all the same. True enough.. But I'm not sure that developing a HPC taxonomy adds value to the process of doing the computation, or, more to the point, to selecting an appropriate way to solve one's particular computational needs. It's not like most folks sit there with their problem and try to analyze it in terms of some computing taxonomy. The "spectrum" of possible ways to build a computer is small enough that you can conceptualize them all simultaneously. It's not like trying to decide where to put a particular hummingbird in the Linnaean scheme. (K P C F G S, etc.) >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] max number of NFS threads: NFS config optimization
- Next message: [Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
