[Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lux, James P james.p.lux at jpl.nasa.govFri Dec 19 06:34:36 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
- Next message: [Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/18/08 11:58 PM, "Eric Liang" <eric.l.2046 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > Clusters, Grids, MPPs, MPI, OpenMP, HA, LB, GPGPU, FPGA, SMP, NUMA, > SSE etc.. > These abbreviations and terms almost cram my head, so I have to > redvelop and re-index them in my memory(brain). > > As a newbie, when I read the articles in wikipekia, I got confused. > In the segment Cluster categorizations > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_cluster#Cluster_categorizations> > of the article about Cluster > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_cluster>, there're three classes: > High-avaiablity clusters, Load-balancing clusters and Grid > computing(?!). While in the article about Parallel computing > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_programming#Classes_of_parallel_compute > rs> > , both "Cluster computing" and "Grid computing" are the subclasses of > "Distribute computing" ,and the third one is "Massive parallel > processing ". IMHO, the latter category is more reasonable(right or not?) . > However, since there are too many cluster software products, how > can I categorize Beowulf like clusters( loosely coupled, use MPI)? or > what's the category of Beowulf like clusters? > I've been looking over the Beowulf book by Seamus Heaney, and I can't find any reference to clusters in it, so maybe Wikipedia has been misled? Perhaps it's a translation issue?<grin> Beowulf -> the definition evolves.. But.. I'd say it's a bunch of interconnected commodity computers intended to form a single computational resource. Some would add "running open source software" Commodity is important. It's not special purpose hardware, but leverages the economies of scale to minimize cost. Bunch of interconnected is important.(no vector processors). Single computational resource -> you can devote the entire cluster to just one problem, as opposed to, say, a mass of transaction processing boxes or web servers in a high availability cluster.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
- Next message: [Beowulf] What's the category of Beowulf among Clusters?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
