[Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
rssr at lncc.br rssr at lncc.brFri Dec 5 12:21:36 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi The problem is not only the size, the most important is how we can access the menory, Bus or other topology. Do not forget the memory refresh time that is always bigger than the memory access time Renato > On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:30:36PM -0500, Prentice Bisbal wrote: > >> Not exactly. 2 GB DIMMs are cheap, but as soon as you go to larger DIMMs >> (4 GB, 8 GB, etc.), the price goes up exponentially. > > My last quote for 2GB and 4GB dimms was linear. > > -- greg > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081205/8c3bcd3b/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
