[Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgSat Dec 6 04:03:07 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Intro question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Eugen Leitl" <eugen at leitl.org> wrote: > (Well, duh). Hmm, they seem to be rehashing the whole SC'06 "Multicore: Breakthrough or Breakdown?" session which looked at this through various peoples eyes. Presentations by the various speakers (including a certain list admin) here: http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~tron/SC06.html I'm wondering though if we're starting to see a subtle shift in direction with more and more emphasis getting placed on accelerators (mainly GPGPU, but including Cell, FPGA's, etc) ? If OpenCL can deliver on its promise of a hardware independent platform that's open source then perhaps it could assist with the proliferation of cores, considering that GPGPUs aren't known for a large RAM:core ratio ? Caveat: I'm a sysadmin, not a programmer, so be gentle.. :) -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Intro question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
