[Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comFri Dec 5 19:20:25 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 06:32:24PM -0800, Bill Broadley wrote: > This is however rather new for CPUs, Intel's been dominating the market with > sub 10GB/sec memory systems for some time now, while AMD has had > 10GB/sec > for er, 3 generations now to little effect. Hey, now, that's a huge overgeneralization. The HPC people who bought AMD after Core2 came out mostly did so for memory bandwidth reasons. Before that, AMD was better on flops as well as stream. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
