[Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nifty Tom Mitchell niftyompi at niftyegg.comFri Dec 5 16:36:21 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:48:43PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > (Well, duh). > > http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/nov08/6912 > > Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers > Where do GPUs fit in this? On the surface a handful of cores in a system with decent cache would quickly displace the need for GPUs and would have about as simple a programming+ compiler model as can be had today. Additional cores are not magic but can set the stage for better math and IO libraries. Me I would rather see more transistors thrown at 128+ bit math. In the back of my mind I suspect that current 64bit IEEE math is getting in the way of global science (Weather, Global warming...). Perhaps 128 integer math ops would be a better place to start. And, Any day now we may need 256 bit integers to manage the national debt. -- T o m M i t c h e l l Found me a new hat, now what?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Next message: [Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
