Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Multicore Is Bad News For Supercomputers

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.com
Fri Dec 5 10:24:10 PST 2008


Bruno Coutinho wrote:
<snip>
> Datamining is useful for both commercial and scientific world and is
> very data-intensive, so I think this issue will be addressed, or at least
> someone (Sun, for example) will build processors for data intensive
> applications that are more balanced, but several times more expensive.
</snip>

Here's some current hardware which is superior to the norm in terms of
I/O (so the manufacturers would claim).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POWER6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasparc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itanium

For those with really deep pockets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEC_SX-9

Q: Do Hitachi and Fujitsu still do vector machines?

I guess my point is that the article itself is a little fluffy. This is
just the old problem of the kernel size overflowing cache/memory
boundaries inconveniently. The answer is always more I/O and tighter
integration.

-- 
Geoffrey D. Jacobs



More information about the Beowulf mailing list