[Beowulf] Re: Intro question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu Bogdan.Costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.deWed Dec 3 13:54:43 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Intro question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Intro question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Mark Hahn wrote: > I don't know whether there would be any problem putting a real > interconnect card (10G, IB, etc) into one of these - some are > designed for GPU cards, so would have 8 or 16x pcie slots. Yes, they often have 2 slots, a PCIe 16x one for a graphics card and a PCIe 1x or PCI one for a TV card (for HTPC use ;-)). > there are "book" format SFF's that might do well for the > gigabit/integrated approach too. If raw performance is not your main interest, yes. These often have previous generation or significantly lower speed CPUs and memory and a rather bad cooling solution dictated by the space contraints. In comparison, most "normal" SFFs can take current generation CPUs and memory. One advantage coming from their lower speed/power components is that some of the "book" ones use an external power supply, laptop style, which generates no noise and eliminates the possibility of broken fans. > I wouldn't mention HTPC, though - in stores around here at least > that term implies a box specialized to look like AV components, > often with milled aluminum bezel, fancy displays, etc. Is there a law against sexy cluster nodes ? :-) How about making those fancy displays show a job ID and the current CPU load ? Would there be any more need for nagios or ganglia ? :-) > I think SFF's would be very nice, though probably would mean giving up any > pretense of server-ish-ness, such as dual sockets or IPMI I have looked some years ago at such a SFF barebone with 2 CPU sockets from Iwill. For some reason I couldn't (maybe still can't) get easily Iwill products here, so I quickly lost interest. But this shows that someone did think of it and that it's technically possible. However today, with multi-core CPUs being mainstream, I can't really see a market case for a SFF with more than one CPU socket. IPMI is the one thing that I really miss in these SFF computers. Not so much for sensors monitoring as for power on/power off/reset and console redirection. I was hoping that at least the Intel vPro would be adopted for SFFs... -- Bogdan Costescu IWR, University of Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany Phone: +49 6221 54 8240, Fax: +49 6221 54 8850 E-mail: bogdan.costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Intro question
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Intro question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
