[Beowulf] Re: POST card recomendation?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at caltech.eduThu Aug 28 09:50:14 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Billy Crook" <billycrook at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 14:00, Perry E. Metzger <perry at piermont.com> wrote: > > Cyberguys sells several models -- PCI and Mini PCI, though no PCI-X > > that I've seen there. > > That is likely because PCI2.0 and 3.0 cards work in PCI-X slots. A > PCI post-code reader *should* work in a PCI-X slot just the same as in > a PCI slot. *Should* being the operative word. One manufacturer of Post cards was kind enough to answer my questions, and the relevant part of the email exchange went like this: > > Some of our cards do support 3.3V but only in the standard PCI -32 > > slot. Not the PCI -64 slot. > >I believe you. What goes wrong in the 64 bit slot? Seems like it >should work, but apparently, it does not. People often put the card in backwards. There is not slot key present. And it doesn't work anyway. So, as I asked in the original post, does anybody here have a POST card that is known to work in a PCI-X slot? If not, I guess I'll just get a PCI one and pray that when I hit a machine with its sole PCI slot filled with a cheap video card, that that video card will work in one of the PCI-X slots. Thanks, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
