[Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comWed Aug 27 10:19:43 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ed Hill <ed at eh3.com> writes: > So, I'm curious about what you consider "legitimate" > and why. And please understand -- I'm not trying to start arguments or > change any opinions about language choices [ other than perhaps my own > :-) ]. It is pretty straightforward. C++ is a big mess -- the language specification is too large for me to fully remember, it is easy to produce constructs that are very difficult to understand. Things like operator overloading encourage people to write unreadable code -- you can examine a short section of a program and not realize that all the familiar operators you think are doing one thing are doing unexpected things. The language is a maintenance programmer's nightmare, and most of the time, programs are being maintained, not developed. > If I had to sum it up in one line it would be: "I'm use C++ a lot because > I just can't seem to find a superior replacement for it." > > And I'm still (half-heart-edly) looking for replacements... That's the reason many people end up using it, including (sometimes) me. Many smart people use C++, few smart people love C++. -- Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
