[Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Perry E. Metzger perry at piermont.comTue Aug 26 14:42:38 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts <tjrc at sanger.ac.uk> writes: >> There is other text that similarly requires that array members be >> allocated consecutively. I'll dig it out as many examples as people >> insist on. > > That would be interesting, because C99 is a pretty recent document, > really, in C terms. Were they, in drafting the C99 document, setting > into stone what was de facto for most compilers? Or is that > requirement in an older standard? Arrays have ALWAYS been consecutively allocated. The language would break otherwise. I'm just quoting chapter-and-verse and posting sample code to nail it into the ground, but this is nothing new. Perry
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Next message: [Beowulf] Stroustrup regarding multicore
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
