[Beowulf] hang-up of HPC Challenge

[Brian Dobbins]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Peter St. John <peter.st.john at gmail.com>wrote:

> What I meant was: surely the stacksize is not really limited, even it it is
> configured without limits?


  If you meant to say *un*limited there, then yes, it's not really
unlimited.  Someone with more kernel knowledge will certainly correct me if
I'm wrong here, but I believe the stack is allocated 'upward' from the end
of where your data/program reside in memory, whereas variables on the heap
are (or tend to be, in fragmented memories) allocated 'downward' from the
maximum available free memory.  So, at some point, those two will meet if
you have limited ram, and your stack size most certainly won't be
'unlimited' at that point.

 ... Bear in mind, my only experience with this is from the old 2.4 series
kernels, where you had to modify how heap allocations were done in order to
get above 2GB on 32-bit machines.  Given that that's ancient history, things
may have changed.  ;)

  (And, in more detail - if you set a limit, you get just that much... if
you set 'unlimited', you get up until stack + heap allocations (+ data
segments, OS stuff, etc.) run you out of memory.  Also, while heap
allocations can be swapped out to virtual memory, I'm not too sure stack can
be, as it tends to be faster, and used a bit differently.  Anyone know?)

  Cheers,
  - Brian


Brian Dobbins
Yale Engineering HPC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080819/d57f36cc/attachment.html