[Beowulf] Building new cluster - estimate
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comMon Aug 4 05:31:48 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Building new cluster - estimate
- Next message: [Beowulf] Building new cluster - estimate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris Samuel wrote: > ----- "Bogdan Costescu" <Bogdan.Costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Chris Samuel wrote: >> >>> 1) Use a mainline kernel, we've found benefit of that >>> over stock CentOS kernels. >> Care to comment on this statement ? > > a) We found that we got better performance out of > the mainline kernels than the CentOS ones; we guess > because they handle newer hardware better (RHEL is > meant to aim for stability over performance) This mirrors our experience, though RHEL stability under intense loads is questionable IMO (talking about the kernel BTW). We find that the missing drivers, the omitted drivers, the backported drivers along with some odd and often useless "features" (4k stacks anyone?) render the RHEL default kernels (and by definition the Centos kernels) less useful for HPC and storage tasks than what we build. Our current standard is a 2.6.23.14 kernel which is rock solid under load. Working on a 2.6.26 based version now (even though I am on vacation/holiday, I just updated it to 2.6.26.1 to address an observed crashing issue with the RDMA server) > b) We can use XFS for scratch space rather than being > tied to the RHEL One True Filesystem (ext3) which > (in our experience) can't handle large amounts of disk > I/O. Combine this with the small upper limit of ext3 partition sizes, the file size limits in ext3, the serialization in the journaling code (ext4 is extents based to help deal with this), ext3 just doesn't make much sense in a storage/HPC system (apart from possibly boot/root file system where performance is less critical). Yeah I have seen studies from folks whom had done 1E6 removes, file creates, and other things who claim xfs is slower than ext3. Yeah, those are bad benchmarks in that they really don't touch on real end user use cases for the most part (apart from possible large scale mail servers and other things like that). > > YMMV! Always ... and wish gas in ~$4USD region, you need to conserve . Having been in London a few months ago, seeing almost $10USD/gallon (3.75 liters), I am gonna stop complaining about our price over here. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Building new cluster - estimate
- Next message: [Beowulf] Building new cluster - estimate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
