[Beowulf] Re: "Code" vs. "Codes"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
G.M.Sigut sigut at id.ethz.chWed Apr 2 22:18:11 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] FREEBSD CLUSTER
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 07:16 -0700, beowulf-request at beowulf.org wrote: ... > Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 19:23:18 +0000 > From: "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater at galactic.demon.co.uk> ... > Yes, but this is "code" as in "thing to keep other things secret" > > cryptography, cryptanalysis, "code breaking" > > "code" as in "I'm finding it hard to code this thing up / the code is > all in asm rather than C" is standard computer speak in the US and > English speaking world. > > "codes" as in "the weather forecasting / CFD / higher order topology > computer programs that I've been working on" - feels utterly alien > but then "code" and "codex" are cognate. Yes. There is also e.g. ASME Code as a set of rules for calculating stresses in mechanical parts... So when I say "I code code code" I am not having a strange hiccup, but I mean "I am writing (coding) a program (code) implementing stress calculation prescription (code)". I always thought that the usage was slightly strange. George -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> George M. Sigut <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ETH Zurich, Informatikdienste, Abteilung Systemdienste, CH-8092 Zurich Swiss Federal Inst. of Technology Zurich, IT Services, System Services e-mail: sigut at id.ethz.ch, Phone:+41 44 632 5763, Fax: +41 44 632 1022 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
- Previous message: [Beowulf] FREEBSD CLUSTER
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: "Code" vs. "Codes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
