[Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Loic Tortay tortay at cc.in2p3.frWed Oct 24 02:01:06 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] regarding ethernet hardware address
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
According to Leif Nixon: > Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> writes: > > >> Some people are running dCache pools on their cluster nodes. > > > > that's cool to know. how do users like it? performance comments? > > Sorry, I don't have much firsthand knowledge about this. I know > Fermilab is consolidating storage from something like 650 worker > nodes, and it seems to work for them. > On the other hand, as far as I know, BNL (Brookhaven) has decided to move away from a similar setup (with more computing nodes providing storage). If I'm not mistaken, the major reason for this change is operation/administration oversight/burden. Loïc. -- | Loïc Tortay <tortay at cc.in2p3.fr> - IN2P3 Computing Centre |
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] regarding ethernet hardware address
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
