[Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comMon Oct 22 13:10:01 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Next message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:49:55PM +0100, John Hearns wrote: > At least on the interconnect side of things, VMs may not be a big > performance drain. There is an IBM paper which measures Infiniband > performance in native and Xen machines, and finds a few percentage loss > in performance. Yeah, now imagine if you were using an interconnect with a high message rate, instead of 2-generation-old InfiniBand. It probably does fine for I/O. But for MPI? -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Next message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
