[Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comMon Oct 22 11:49:55 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Next message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 12:51 -0500, Brian D. Ropers-Huilman wrote: > > Interesting comment for this particular list. While I'm all in favor > of MS "seeing the light," so to speak, your comment on "... everything > else as a VM guest on top of a device-independent layer. At least I > hope we are going there." With everything so performance oriented in > our world, I just find this comment surprising. > At least on the interconnect side of things, VMs may not be a big performance drain. There is an IBM paper which measures Infiniband performance in native and Xen machines, and finds a few percentage loss in performance. http://xen.xensource.com/files/xs0106_virtualizing_infiniband.pdf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Next message: [Beowulf] small-footprint MS WIn "MinWin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
