[Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seMon Oct 22 11:48:21 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Jeffrey B. Layton" <laytonjb at charter.net> writes: > Leif Nixon wrote: >> Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca> writes: >> >> >>> [...] commodity disks are plenty reliable >>> and are not a significant source of uptime problems. >>> >> >> That's not quite a general truth. 8^) >> > > Even though the data shows otherwise? OK, let me rephrase: That's just true in general, and it's the specific cases that bite you. On *average* disks might not be a large source of problems, but when you run into a bad batch it hurts. But that's true for all components, of course. My take on this might be a bit coloured from spending some time the other day in the company of a representative sample of disks from a certain bad batch, a crowbar, a sledgehammer and several pounds of thermite. (Sorry, rgb, no sucker rod available around here.) -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] distributing storage amongst compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
