[Beowulf] Re: [Dulug] Parallel debuggers (fwd)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caFri Oct 19 21:10:03 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [Dulug] Parallel debuggers (fwd)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: [Dulug] Parallel debuggers (fwd)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> What is the current state of the art for MPI (or PVM or other parallel >> code) debuggers? I think both Totalview and Allinea's DDT are the current state of the market. the state of the art is probably less practical ;) I do occasionally hear about academic efforts (TAO and something using Eclipse). > I vaguely recall some review articles on this on CWM >> and/or CM, and of course there has been list discussion in the past, but what are CWM and CM? > sarcastic, but true. Part of this is because there's too much > information to look at using a regular debugger except for the most DDT is based on a parallel-aware GUI that uses GDB for it's low-level, per-rank manipulations. I think it's a good design - it certainly tries to provide the user with a lot of leverage across many-way parallel jobs. > counts (making one window per process impossible), and the third is > that, being remote, the fancy gui based debuggers run like a ruptured > turtle over the internet. I've run DDT a few times from home (cablemodem, asymmetric bandwidth, ~15ms rtt, ssh -YC) and it seemed OK. regards, mark hahn
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [Dulug] Parallel debuggers (fwd)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: [Dulug] Parallel debuggers (fwd)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
