[Beowulf] Re: Intel quad core nodes?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Justin Penney jpenney at advancedclustering.comThu Oct 11 08:16:30 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Tilera to Introduce 64-Core Processor
- Next message: [Beowulf] Channel bonding, again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I recently ran a customer's weather modeling code on a variety of machines. This program is very sensitive to memory. The following are the run times while running 4 processes. Please note that the Xeon, Opteron and Barcelona numbers are from dual socket machines. Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz - 3h16m Xeon Quad 2.0 GHz - 2h51m Barcelona 2.0 GHz - 1h40m Opteron 2220SE 2.8 GHz - 2h24m At 8 processes: Xeon Quad 2.0 GHz - 2h52m Barcelona 2.0 GHz - 1h22m Barnet Wagman wrote: > I'm moving towards setting up a small cluster (my first), and am > thinking about using Intel quad core processors. However, I'm a little > concerned about memory contention. I'm (tentatively) going to have one > processor per node (this appears to be the cheapest way to go), but I > still wonder whether four cores will choke Intel's memory architecture. > (AMD's Barcelona may be better in this regard, but it doesn't seem to be > available yet, at least not through retail channels). > > I'd like to hear any opinions on this issue. And if you've used quad > core processors, I'd certainly like to hear about your experiences > (including which processor you've used). -- justin penney email: jpenney at advancedclustering.com phone: 913.643.0300 option 2 im: http://livehelp.advancedclustering.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Tilera to Introduce 64-Core Processor
- Next message: [Beowulf] Channel bonding, again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
